01-29-2010 - Work/Read

01-29-2010 – Work/Read

The evidence today is overwhelming that an invasion of Japan was not necessary to bring the war to an end.  Japan was defeated, in disarray, and ready to surrender.  The U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, which interviewed 700 Japanese and political officials after the war, came to this conclusion:

Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts and supported by the testimony of surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey’s opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.

After the war American scholar Robert Butow went through the papers of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the records of the International Military Tribunal of the Far East (which tried Japanese leaders as war criminals), and the interratation files of the U.S. Army  He also interviewed many of the Japanese principals and came to this conclusion: “Had the Allies given the Prince (Prince Konoye, special emissary to Moscow, who was on Russian intercession for peace) a week of grace in which to obtain his Government’s support of the acceptance of the proposals, the war might have ended toward the latter part of July or the very beginning of the month of August, without the atomic bomb and without Soviet participation in the conflict.”

-

Wondering what has changed? Read about it here.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
EXIF information
model NIKON D300
exposureTime 1/30 s
isoEquiv 100
aperture 2.8
focalLength 24
29. January 2010, 08:00 Categories: Budapest, Europe